Morris Kline History Of Mathematics Pdf

Open Preview

See a Problem?

We'd love your help. Let us know what's wrong with this preview of Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Volume 1 by Morris Kline.

Thanks for telling us about the problem.

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Be the first to ask a question about Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Volume 1

Community Reviews

· 183 ratings · 16 reviews

Start your review of Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Volume 1

Nov 24, 2015 Jose Moa rated it it was amazing

Perhaps the best and most exaustive ,médium to high level,history of mathematics and mathematical though ever written

Dec 31, 2008 dusty.rhodes rated it really liked it

This is a great, smooth read, if you're comfortable with general math. It is more difficult (though arguably more rewarding) read if you are not. Working through all of the problems/equations is well worth it. The inclusion of non-modern notations is fascinating.

In short, I wish that I had been taught math through this lens rather than the rather dry "learn these things by rote and if you're lucky, we'll mention Newton and Leibniz in passing." Not that the individuals are the important factor in this history, but rather that the history and progression of math lends mental stickiness to the ideas.

Favorite Quote:
"...the Romans [...:] entire role in the history of mathematics was that of an agent of destruction."

...more

Oct 31, 2013 Hannah rated it it was ok

Kline is a very biased author. He gives no credit to the non-European civilizations. His language about the ancient Egyptians and Babylonians is, for example, very demeaning. The book involves some pretty complicated math, but it was the degrading language that made it more annoying to read. Our professor wanted us to see that some people still hold on to a very Eurocentric view of the way mathematics developed.

After Descartes comes math. I'm reading this from the library without really paying too much attention, and vaguely pretending it will solve my coding problems in xna.

A helper text for Manuel DeLanda.

After Descartes comes math. I'm reading this from the library without really paying too much attention, and vaguely pretending it will solve my coding problems in xna.

A helper text for Manuel DeLanda.

...more

Jun 01, 2014 Victor Davis rated it it was amazing

Definitely reading part 2. A very riveting account of exactly the title. All the anecdotes, the myths, the stories, the hard facts, personalities, rivalries, everything. Oh, and math! It's refreshing to read elementary math woven seamlessly into the text. He doesn't shy away from it like most. Wonderful for the math literate, charming and coherent even for the rest. Definitely reading part 2. A very riveting account of exactly the title. All the anecdotes, the myths, the stories, the hard facts, personalities, rivalries, everything. Oh, and math! It's refreshing to read elementary math woven seamlessly into the text. He doesn't shy away from it like most. Wonderful for the math literate, charming and coherent even for the rest. ...more

[Reseña de la edición unificada de la obra]

El objetivo de este libro es presentar el desarrollo del pensamiento matemático así como el desarrollo de esta disciplina y su aplicación a lo largo de la historia de la humanidad. El libro abarca desde las civilizaciones de Mesopotamia y Babilonia hasta el primer tercio del siglo pasado, pues fue escrito en 1972 y en palabras del autor, era entonces pronto para analizar qué lugar en la historia tendrían los desarrollos producidos más allá de 1930. Así, a lo largo de sus 51 capítulos y 1600 páginas, el autor presenta un estudio pormenorizado, exhaustivo y (esencialmente) cronológico sobre los desarrollos y las corrientes matemáticas que considera que tuvieron una mayor influencia a lo largo de la historia y en el estado actual de esta ciencia. Los primeros capítulos están dedicados al estudio de las matemáticas en la Antigüedad con numerosos planteamientos filosóficos y nada complicados desde el punto de vista técnico. En contraste, hacia el capítulo 15 empezará a abordar los avances matemáticos en la Europa posmedieval, con un texto mucho más técnico y algo más independiente del contexto histórico. Las matemáticas de los siglos XVII, XVIII y XIX constituyen el núcleo del libro, incluyendo áreas como álgebra, cálculo, geometría diferencial, y a medida que avanzamos en el tiempo, también geometría algebraica, teoría de números, topología o lógica, y por último se introducen las prespectivas de avance de principios del siglo XX.

Pasando a valorar los contenidos del libro, es de justicia reconocer el inmenso mérito del autor por la elaboración de esta obra a todas luces colosal. En mi opinión consigue su objetivo de proporcionar una visión global de la evolución del pensamiento matemático, consiguiendo conectar las primeras ideas documentadas en las civilizaciones de Mesopotamia, Babilonia y Egipto con las matemáticas que he aprendido. Además, pese a la complejidad de muchas de los planteamientos presentados, están escritos con mucha claridad y exhaustividad, lo cual hace de esta obra un libro especializado y no de divulgación. Por otra parte, pienso que esta circunstancia hace extraordinariamente difícil la tarea de hacer una lectura comprensiva de muchos de los capítulos. Así, ha habido muchos momentos en los que la experiencia ha sido bastante agotadora. La estructura de los capítulos, sin dejar de ser flexible, estaba bien compartimentada por siglos, algo que tiene especial mérito teniendo en cuenta el volumen descomunal de los contenidos a presentar.

Por enumerar algunas de las carencias de este libro, tiene una marcada visión eurocentrista, restringiendo a Occidente su análisis en la mayor parte de la obra (algo que por otra parte el autor justifica en el prólogo aduciendo que las matemáticas que ha dejado de lado no han sido tan relevantes). Digna de mención me parece también la infrarrepresentación de las mujeres en la obra, siendo las únicas mencionadas Hipatia de Alejandría, Sophie Germain, Sofia Kovalevskaya y Emmy Noether, si no me falla la memoria. Es tremendamente sintomático de la falta de perspectiva de género en este libro que se presente a Hipatia como "la hija de Teon de Alejandría" sin ni siquiera presentar sus aportaciones, o que no se mencionen los primos de Germain. Esto puede ser debido en buena parte a la escasa participación de las mujeres en matemáticas y en ciencias en general a lo largo de la historia, y también a que la conciencia de género en ciencias era bastante inferior a la actual en la segunda mitad del siglo pasado. Una tercera carencia no es culpa del autor, y es la falta de las matemáticas de los últimos casi 100 años. Ya no solo por los grandes hitos que se han conseguido, como la demostración del último teorema de Fermat; sobre todo por el desarrollo de las corrientes de fundamentación de las matemáticas y la perspectiva actual del papel de las matemáticas en el mundo. Creo que la falta de relevancia en el libro de la teoría de probabilidades y las matemáticas aplicadas tal y como las conocemos hoy en día pueden tener su origen en esta carencia.

De este libro he aprendido muchas cosas. En un plano más anecdótico, he aprendido numerosas curiosidades como que el signo = tiene su origen en que quien lo introdujo por primera vez consideraba que no hay nada más igual que dos rectas paralelas. Pero más importante, he aprendido sobre el origen de las ideas que hoy nos enseñan en el grado en matemáticas y el encomiable esfuerzo que se ha hecho para llegar a las mismas. Es esencial para cualquiera que se quiera dedicar a la investigación en matemáticas tener presente que grandes matemáticos no estuvieron exentos de cometer graves errores y que detrás del paso de un teorema al siguiente hay multitud de intentos infructuosos. En esto, pienso que el autor también consigue su objetivo.

Para terminar, pienso que para abordar la lectura de este libro hacen falta estudios superiores en matemáticas o ingeniería. Dicho lo cual, me parece un libro muy recomendable para aprender historia de las matemáticas, aunque quizás para leerlo en un intervalo de tiempo muy prolongado o para consultar determinados capítulos.

...more

Jun 11, 2018 Sigvald rated it really liked it

What appealed to me in this series of books is that it seems to give the big picture of mathematics, introducing all sub-disciplines and how they are related. To be honest I did perhaps not realize that it is still a very detailed history book. While unfamiliar and a bit heavy at the beginning (I don't usually read history) I eventually got used to it and I must say that after I read this book I am truly amazed by the old greeks in particular (volume one covers from antiquity up to the invention What appealed to me in this series of books is that it seems to give the big picture of mathematics, introducing all sub-disciplines and how they are related. To be honest I did perhaps not realize that it is still a very detailed history book. While unfamiliar and a bit heavy at the beginning (I don't usually read history) I eventually got used to it and I must say that after I read this book I am truly amazed by the old greeks in particular (volume one covers from antiquity up to the invention of calculus).

While the book is generally in a chronological order, it jumps a bit back and forth because it treats topic by topic (e.g. first algebra in the 1600s, then geometry in the 1600s and so forth). While this makes it better organized and probably more interesting, it is sometimes a bit hard to connect which historical event happend before one another.

The book is well written but detailed enough that you should be rather passionate about the subject. If you've never solved differential equations it's probably not for you. But if you're up for this sort of literature, I would definitely recommend it.

...more

È un interessante e dettagliato excursus sulla storia della Matematica e della evoluzione del pensiero matematico. Personalmente ho trovato affascinante il primo volume, molto più del secondo, in quanto ha descritto le radici dei numeri per come lo conosciamo e usiamo oggigiorno nella cultura occidentale, a partire dagli albori e dal dilemma dello zero e della notazione posizionale.

In ogni caso un lavoro davvero entusiasmante, ricco di spunti di approfondimento e riflessione e di tanta sana Mate

In ogni caso un lavoro davvero entusiasmante, ricco di spunti di approfondimento e riflessione e di tanta sana Matematica!

...more

Jul 24, 2020 Raúl rated it liked it

If you want to follow step by step some of the reasoning behind important mathematical subjects, this is good... But it seems like an enormous effort to reproduce something already done. If you only want to grasp some intuitions and general ideas about mathematics and scientific thinking, which was my purpose, you'll have to read between lines If you want to follow step by step some of the reasoning behind important mathematical subjects, this is good... But it seems like an enormous effort to reproduce something already done. If you only want to grasp some intuitions and general ideas about mathematics and scientific thinking, which was my purpose, you'll have to read between lines ...more

Jun 08, 2019 Parsa rated it really liked it

Some results were very much abbreviated, as in : "next, newton proved that...". Much of the book therefore, amounted to a big collection of formulas without real insight into how they were proved or derived. Other than that it was quite enjoyable, if at times hard to understand. Some results were very much abbreviated, as in : "next, newton proved that...". Much of the book therefore, amounted to a big collection of formulas without real insight into how they were proved or derived. Other than that it was quite enjoyable, if at times hard to understand. ...more

Apr 27, 2020 Victor Gordan rated it it was amazing

A great introduction to the history of mathematics! To me it seems to go quite in depth into the details, maybe a bit too much at times. Some of the Classical Greek proofs are tricky to follow due to the completely different way they had to doing mathematics, compared to our modern version.

The book covers the history of mathematics from its beginnings in Mesopotamia and Egypt, to the discovery of Calculus by Newton and Leibniz in the 17th century.

I do have to say that the book seems slightly bia

The book covers the history of mathematics from its beginnings in Mesopotamia and Egypt, to the discovery of Calculus by Newton and Leibniz in the 17th century.

I do have to say that the book seems slightly biased towards Europeans, as while going over the mathematics of Babylonians, Egyptians, Arabs, and Hindus, the author just makes it seem like their advancements were not huge, due to the fact that they mostly worked on applied mathematics. The book also completely ignores East Asian and American mathematics, as they did not influence the main branch of mathematics which is the European one (I do have to say this is a fair point).

Overall a great read that I would recommend to all lovers of mathematics.

...more

Jul 03, 2020 Goo rated it did not like it

I only read about one third of this.

A bit too mathematical for casual reading after a long day spent doing... math.

This does seem like a fine book and I might very well finish it later in life.

Morris Kline was a Professor of Mathematics, a writer on the history, philosophy, and teaching of mathematics, and also a popularizer of mathematical subjects.

Other books in the series

News & Interviews

If you've never gone on a short story reading binge, we highly recommend it as a regular practice. Short fiction plays by different rules than...

Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.